I know that with this week's question will enter into a conflict and in a dilemma but the question is in the air: in favor of low-cost firms cloned the big brands? Do they do it for lack of originality or why the public so requests? Personally I think it's a bit of everything, but there are marks showing that they need a good designer to the front as it passed by cloning.
We want to hear your thoughts on this subject so you can leave your opinion in our Jared Responses .
What do you think that low-cost firms copying the great designers? A lack of originality or public demand?
As I said before I think both parties (firms and the public) are equally responsible for this phenomenon to happen, although there are companies that not only inspire or cloned some parts, but the whole collection is inspired by other designers. Where is the originality? Do you compensate your signature to be labeled a cloner? Remember respond Jared Responses .
Last week we asked ...
Last week my colleague Chloe threw a very good question:
I loved the openness with which Marta.H has given us his answer:
I invest in things that I like and I can afford. God knows I do not buy jeans that are cheap Inditex, because it is cheaper to invest in a Levis that occur within themselves and fix you free bass. Now to buy a dress from 150 € a masstige brand, I prefer to design it and send it as for the same price and unique in the world.